Knowledge
The knowledge is the information that it is recognized, and was memorized.
Or it is a thought and the skill that it has about a human being and things.
The knowledge is classified at various points of view.
In the psychology, the knowledge is handled as a long-term memory, and a classification of the memory is just similar and classifies "declarative knowledge", knowledge of the action with "procedural knowledge" by knowledge made a visualization.
The knowledge (the multiplication table, a gravitational constant on the earth) about the scientific law and the knowledge (that "the Japanese nation's capital is Tokyo") about the social agreement are nominated for an example of the declarative knowledge.
How to use chopsticks, how to play the piano, the driving of the car are nominated for an example of the procedural knowledge.
I can call "knowing that", the latter "knowing how" in the former.
From the viewpoint of formalization, transmission method, the knowledge is classified in "form intellect" and "tacit knowledge".
It is a classification used in the world such as the knowledge management.
Tacit knowledge is extremely difficult knowledge whether it is impossible to describe declaratively.
Procedural knowledge and the intuitive recognition contents are considered to be tacit knowledge.
For example, anyone has the knowledge about "the beautiful woman", but cannot define it definitely.
In the modern British and American analytic philosophy, the following things are used as classic Sadayoshi of the knowledge.
I limit that I have knowledge that a certain cognitive person A "is X" to that case in the case of the following.
In a word, it was expected that "the knowledge was faith named the justified truth", and the analysis that classified 2 in "objective knowledge" and "subjective faith" simply was the mainstream in this in a for a long time.
I decided it, and gave strong counterexample for the reckoning analysis of such a stiffening in 1950's (the issue of).
Though I have faith named the justified truth if I easily say, a problem is the problem that the situation that it cannot be said that I know it how even if I think can imagine.
I received this and the epistemology pro-the later analysis added a hand to a classic definition of the knowledge in various form and groped for satisfactory analysis.
Or it is a thought and the skill that it has about a human being and things.
The knowledge is classified at various points of view.
In the psychology, the knowledge is handled as a long-term memory, and a classification of the memory is just similar and classifies "declarative knowledge", knowledge of the action with "procedural knowledge" by knowledge made a visualization.
The knowledge (the multiplication table, a gravitational constant on the earth) about the scientific law and the knowledge (that "the Japanese nation's capital is Tokyo") about the social agreement are nominated for an example of the declarative knowledge.
How to use chopsticks, how to play the piano, the driving of the car are nominated for an example of the procedural knowledge.
I can call "knowing that", the latter "knowing how" in the former.
From the viewpoint of formalization, transmission method, the knowledge is classified in "form intellect" and "tacit knowledge".
It is a classification used in the world such as the knowledge management.
Tacit knowledge is extremely difficult knowledge whether it is impossible to describe declaratively.
Procedural knowledge and the intuitive recognition contents are considered to be tacit knowledge.
For example, anyone has the knowledge about "the beautiful woman", but cannot define it definitely.
In the modern British and American analytic philosophy, the following things are used as classic Sadayoshi of the knowledge.
I limit that I have knowledge that a certain cognitive person A "is X" to that case in the case of the following.
In a word, it was expected that "the knowledge was faith named the justified truth", and the analysis that classified 2 in "objective knowledge" and "subjective faith" simply was the mainstream in this in a for a long time.
I decided it, and gave strong counterexample for the reckoning analysis of such a stiffening in 1950's (the issue of).
Though I have faith named the justified truth if I easily say, a problem is the problem that the situation that it cannot be said that I know it how even if I think can imagine.
I received this and the epistemology pro-the later analysis added a hand to a classic definition of the knowledge in various form and groped for satisfactory analysis.